JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 13, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Jose Ernesto Macias Medina

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia C-623/15.

El peticionario, en su condición de representante de la Sociedad Aportes San Isidro SAS, argumentó en su memorial que la Corte eludió el análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional y que la precitada providencia extingue el derecho de propiedad por inexplotación, hecho contrario a la Constitución Política y a la Jurisprudencia de la Corte, en tanto dicha garantía es perpetua.

La Corte decidió RECHAZAR, por falta de legitimación, la solicitud de nulidad formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. RECHAZAR, por falta de legitimación, la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia C-623 de 2015 -expediente D-9344-, formulada por el ciudadano José Ernesto Macías Medina en calidad de representante legal de la sociedad Aportes San Isidro S.A.S.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentGabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.